![]() That should be the same information, but retrieved from the UK.Īs always, we owe a massive thanks to /u/ZombieYeti from the BrickHound Discord for providing this valuable data. In the meantime, if you live outside North America, I recommend going off of Huw's list over at Brickset. To be safe, and since it'll be impossible to know for sure until its too late, I am going to mark this months list as for North America.įor the November list I hope to have other regions added to the spreadsheet as well, that will be my top priority. My first instinct was that the EU lists were simply using outdated information, as they have a lot of set that recently got moved out of 2023 retirement, but I am wondering if Lego is beginning to have wildly different set retirements in different regions. Also, since the press release refers to this as the “KodakCoin cryptocurrency” and not the “KodakCoin token,” I agree the story does read like just another instance of dead weight being hitched to the crypto bubble.Hey everyone, its a new month which means a new retirement update! As you can tell by the title, there are some big changes this month.įirst, to address the elephant in the room: has published their last chance pages in every region, and only the North American lists match the spreadsheet. Considering the trouble with “birthing” CryptoKitties, I would expect this to bring Ethereum to its knees if it were implemented today. My head spins thinking about how much activity this would add to the Ethereum network. If a registered image discovered on the Web did not contain a code corresponding to the registered IP address where it is found online by a web crawler, then a copyright violation would be recorded and the registered owner of the unauthorized IP address would be notified. Presumably this means any registered, licensed image would contain an imbedded code that ties it to a sale or lease recorded in the KODAKOne blockchain and the registered purchaser of said work would need to keep its use of the material updated on the KOKAKOne blockchain. The press release states the “KODAKOne platform provides continual web crawling in order to monitor and protect the IP of the images registered in the KODAKOne system.” Since “currency” must be fungible, “Kodakcoin” would technically be a token and not a cryptocoin or cryptocurrency.Ģ. Kodakcoin might use the non-fungible Etherium token standard #721, similar to CryptoKitties. I like the occasional brain teaser, so I will take a W.A.G at answering this question. ![]() What does the KodakCoin have to do with the unsolvable problem of photographers “who’ve long struggled to assert control over their work”? It’s peer-to-peer, and the silent majority is sick and tired of centralized systems that only get more corrupt with more power. In other words, your wasting your time bashing it. Fortunately, just as we have seen with Trump, the more the establishment piles on, the more their hand of desperation is exposed, and the more conterproductive their efforts. They just hope the rest of us don’t figure it out, which is why they employ FUD (Fear, Uncertainty & Doubt). It’s not that they don’t understand it – they do. One thing is clear, the only thing the establishment hates more than Trump is Bitcoin. I’m not sure what Kodak’s solution entails, but I envision it as a peer-to-peer method of making sure photographers get paid directly from the user of the picture. Are some fraudulent and will some fail? Of course, but how can you root against it, especially when there is no alternative to replace the current debt-based fiat system? Govts, including our own, are investigating how to utilize the blockchain to make improvements. There are thousands of businesses like Populous that are aiming to improve supply chain efficiencies. It’s the same reason money managers are so negative, as cryptos are competing for assets. ![]() Since factoring is the largest revenue stream for many banks, it’s easy to understand why bank execs are so negative on cryptos. Populous is one of the companies wanting to provide this more efficient solution –. The blockchain allows anyone to finance a companies receivables for a fraction of the cost. Currently when small businesses need to factor (finance) their receivables they must rely on a bank, which takes a large cut for this short-term lending. One simple example is an accounting solution. One just needs to be open-minded and ask themselves a few basic questions, like, are there efficiencies to be gained by eliminating middlemen? The Internet certainly helped, but did it eliminate all the waste? One does not need to be brilliant to understand the value of the blockchain.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |